Last Modified: May 5, 2013
Contents: Caveats; Basics; Antennas; Multiband Wonder Antennas; Mag Mounts; Glass Mounts; Other Antenna Mounts; Transceiver Mounts; Coax Cable; SWR; Transceivers; Handhelds; A Note on APRS; Power Considerations; Power Amplifiers; SSB; Odds and Ends;
The roof of a vehicle is a very good place to mount a VHF antenna. However, all new vehicles come equipped with side curtain SRS devices, commonly called airbags. They typically are mounted along the edges of the headliner including the rear seat area if there is one. The wiring to these devices may be routed through any one (or more) of the roof pillars. Extra care is required when installing antennas in vehicles so equipped. If you are the least bit apprehensive about your installation, seek professional help from your dealer. In any case, you should have a copy of the service manual. Typical examples are in the $70 range, and easily pay for themselves when problems arise.
A lot of the material presented here is a duplication of that contained in my Antennas and Wiring articles. Because there are far more VHF/UHF mobile operators than HF operators, and they are similar with respect to installation and safety issues, in a lot of cases VHF/UHF operation present unique problems. For example antenna placement tends to be more critical, and so does the DC power requirements. Hence, this separate article covering these unique differences.
After WWII, mobile operation was limited to 10 meters, and above. It wasn't until July 14, 1948, that the FCC allowed mobile operation from 160 meters, and up. At the time the vast majority of the mobile operation was on the HF bands. In fact, if you read the History article, you'll note of the myriad of companies making HF mobile antennas.
Fast forward 10 years (circa 1958), and things had begun to change. There were a couple of 2 meter AM repeaters in southern California, but no FM repeaters we're so used to nowadays. The situation soon changed as knowledgable amateurs started converting commercial low, and high-band FM radios to operate within the amateur bands
Beginning about 1970, the ARRL was instrumental in setting up band plans for 10 meters (the lowest FM band), 6 meters, 2 meters, and 70 centimeters (440 MHz.). Once this plan (actually a gentlemen's agreement) was excepted by the FCC, VHF, and UHF FM operation became ubiquitous, almost over night. Manufacturers like Drake, Kenwood, Icom, Heathkit, and even TenTec, introduced inexpensive VHF, and UHF transceivers. Soon after, Kenwood introduced their TR2400 handheld. Not the first handheld, but one of the first the with frequency synthesis, and memory! The rest, as they say, is history! Just for the record, the Tempo S1 holds the honor of the first synthesized handheld, but it didn't have memory. I still own a working one, I was given as a birthday present in 1973!
Most new amateurs soon learn that FM repeater operation can be very limiting in scope, especially when using an FM handheld. This fact has been mitigated somewhat by EchoLink®, and other Internet-supported repeater nodes. And, it is still be backbone of ECOMM (emergency communication) services. Based on this, here's a bit of advice for the neophyte. Don't buy an FM handheld as your first radio, no matter how fancy it is. My suggestion? Buy an all mode, all band, transceiver even if it is used!
Don't get caught playing the Gain Game!
The most common mistake newcomers make (after buying an FM only handheld), is the selection of their mobile antenna. Apparently, the only consideration seems to be the amount of advertised gain; commonly referred to as playing the Gain Game. Trust me on this, there is more to VHF mobile antennas than their advertised gain figures! Like sturdiness, and weather resistance to name just two.
Danny Richardson, K6MHE, wrote an article for CQ a few years ago concerning the differences between 1/4, 1/2, and 5/8 wave VHF mobile antennas, replete with modeling graphs. It makes very interesting reading even if you don't know how to interpret the included graphs, because the text tells the story. It short, the mounting location, and style, have more to do with performance, than the type of antenna used! A similar article appears on page 43, of the March 2012 issue of QST, as written by John Portune, W6NBC. And, Tom Rauch, W8JI, has a similar article on line.
Since we're dealing with FM (≈5 kHz or ≈2.5 kHz deviation), it should also be noted that doubling your ERP (effective radiated power) will not magically double your coverage distance. In fact, it takes an increase of nearly 10 times (i.e.: 50 watts to 500!) to double the distance covered, all else being equal. And even that isn't a given due to variances in surrounding terrain. If you don't understand why this is so, read this article on Fresnel Zones.
There is another aspect of the Gain Game. If you don't know what the gain figures are measured against, they mean absolutely nothing! One manufacturer's fine print states their gain is measured against the average HT antenna; in other words a rubber ducky. Sure puts new meaning in the term dBd!
Exaggerated claims don't stop with gain figures. One import antenna's manual clearly states it has (sic) two phasing coils, too increase gain. The real truth is, one of these "coils" is nothing more than a coupler used to connect the two upper portions of the antenna together. Smack one hard enough with a low-hanging limb, and your antenna will be no more. Do this with a quarter wave whip, and all you'll do it bend it. A little straightening and you're back on the air.
The other is a coil, wound with what appears to be #24 wire. This more than likely accounts for its low power rating. On top of it all, the NMO style mounts most import antennas use, are not compatible with genuine NMO (New Motorola, shown right) mounts. Adding even more insult, they are typically over priced, and their sturdiness is in question, especially those that use SO239 mounting methods.
The SO239 chassis connector was designed to mate with a PL259, coaxial connector. It was never meant to be an antenna mount, but over the years several manufacturers have used it, in an apparent attempt to avoid paying royalties to Motorola. As I point out below, SO239 mounts are not waterproof when the antenna is removed, while NMO mounts are. This is an important consideration if you take your vehicle to the local wash-a-teria.
In urban areas where higher angles of radiation are preferred, you're typically better off with a lower gain antenna. If you're living in an suburban or rural area, gain antennas might have a slight edge. It all depends on the HAAT (height above average terrain) of the repeater being used with respect to the mobile station's HAAT. In Denver, Colorado and other mountainous areas, you're better off with a unity gain antenna (1/4 wave vertical) as the repeaters are much higher in elevation (in relation to the mobiles).
My personal V/U antenna is a Larsen® NMO2/70 (see photo at right). It is currently the most popular dual band antenna sold. It is rugged (I've had mine on 7 different vehicles), it is rated at 200 watts dead carrier, and requires no tuning. At ≈$90 with the NMO mount, it is also reasonably priced.
Most of the import antennas are rated from 75 to 200 watts. Where these power ratings come from is a mystery. For example, an Icom V8000 with ≈75 watts out will burn up the average import antenna in due time, so you need to take their power ratings with a grain of salt! Even the venerable Larsen NMO2/70 will get warm during long transmissions at these power levels. I used to run 160+ watts out mobile to a Larsen NMO150. Due to the high power heating the whip, it was necessary to change the whip about every 6 to 8 months. Don't kid yourself; high output power levels require a lot of special considerations (more on this later on).
There are only a few stealthy V/U antennas. The few readily available are all mono band units, universally poor in terms of efficiency, and they are expensive. There is a special made (read that as expensive), dual bander which replaces a stock AM/FM antenna. It does not exhibit any gain, so its only attribute is stealth (thankfully!). If stealthiness is worth $400+ to you, go for it!
The Bel (B), is named after Alexander Graham Bell. It is to big for our use, so we use the decibel (dB) which is one tenth of a Bel. The decibel is a way of expressing a power ratio logarithmically. It is expressed as 10 log10 (P1/P2). If voltage is used, the expression is 20 log10 (V1/V2), but since we're speaking of antennas here, we use the first expression. We also deal with two suffixes, or more correctly references. They are i for isotropic, and d for dipole.
An isotropic radiator doesn't actually exist, but it represents a free-space, single-point source of radiation. If we're using a dipole as a reference, we also consider it in free space. Thus the difference in gain between dBi and dBd is ≈2.6 dB, but only in free space. Down here on earth, the difference between dBi and dBd, may be as high as 8 dB! It should be obvious that we need to be careful when comparing one antenna's gain with another. Without the i or d reference, the gain difference is moot.
It should also be noted that gain is not the only figure of merit that should be applied to a VHF mobile antenna. Pattern is just as, if not more important. Believing otherwise is a common myth.
Multiband Wonder Antennas
There are at least two Pacific Rim companies making four band antennas designed to work with the single-port Yaesu® FT-8900 and others which cover the 10, 6 and 2 meters, and 70 cm FM bands. They mount on a modified SO239 mounting scheme. This mounting method negates the use of a through-hole mount due to water intrusion problems. Further, to reduce overall weight their loading coils are miniscule in size. As a result, their sturdiness and efficiency are suspect. Their power handling capabilities are also suspect, as owners often report burn out problems with the base matching coils. Unfortunately, there isn't any low-cost alternative, other than using 2 or 3 antennas, and 2 or 3 diplexers to cover the same frequency spread.
This points out an interesting fact. The FT-8900 has a street price of $500. For the same money, you can buy a good used FT-857D or Icom IC-706MkIIg. Both of the transceivers have separate HF and VHF ports making antenna choices easier. That's not the main drawing card, however. Both of these models are all-band, and all-mode too! While 6 and 10 meter FM might be fun, 6 and 10 meter SSB (see below) is even more so. And, when you upgrade your Tech licence, you'll be ready to go! If you haven't purchased your FT-8900, you might want to give your purchase more thought.
Mag mounts were never intended to be used for permanent installations, yet that's what far too many folks do. The usual excuse is, they don't want to drill a hole, and thus damage their precious new vehicle. The truth is, a mag mount can cause more damage than a hole. They do in fact, scratch the surface they're stuck to, no matter what precautions are taken. The major reason is, the magnets collect all manner of metallic brake dust, and other pollutants. Whether you R&R the antenna regularly, or leave it in place, day-to-day travel causes them to move around, and all of that attracted grit acts just like sand paper thus marring the surface. The resulting damage is often called mooning, after the circular marks left behind. And just wait until you hit something hard and the antenna dislodges. Personally, I won't take the chance, and neither should you!
Here's another interesting fact about mag mounts. The amount of "sticking" force is directly related to the thickness of the steel. When demonstrated in a dealer's showroom, they're always stuck to a much thicker piece of steel than the sheet metal on a vehicle. Adding insult, the outer surfaces of some higher priced vehicles use a composite consisting of layers of steel and plastic, or of aluminum. In these cases, mag mounts will not stick at all.
If you're looking for an alternative to a mag mount, then consider an angle bracket like the Larsen®one shown at right. While they do require three holes for their sheet metal screws, the resulting holes are below the surface, and as easily filled with body putty (dumdum). If they have a drawback, it is the lack of seam clearance in late model vehicles.
However you justify using a mag mount, there is one problem with them that cannot be justified, and that's common mode current, no matter how many magnets the mount has! RF current must return to its source. The only path a mag mount has is through its capacitive coupling. Whether the resulting common mode causes you any known problems is perhaps moot, because sometimes the problems go unseen. For example, the OBDII data can become corrupted, and you'll never know until you get your vehicle serviced under warranty!
Virtually every vehicle made today uses passivated glass. Embedded in the glass are metallic particles which serve several purposes. First, they block most UV rays which lessens fading of the interior trim pieces, and they reduce the heat load. Less air conditioning, better fuel mileage. To a lessor degree, the metallic particles act as RF shield for the digital electronics inside the vehicle. It is this latter property which makes glass mount antennas nearly worthless, as they rely on capacitive coupling. What's more, glass mount antennas do not have a ground plane under them. This causes the return currents to flow on the outside of the coax. In fact, the coax does the majority of the radiation. Larsen, the largest maker of glass mounts, doesn't recommend mounting them on passivated glass. The best advice I can give anyone about using glass mount antennas is this; don't!
Other Antenna Mounts
Antenna mounts are another area of contention. Far too many folks just won't drill a hole to properly mount their VHF antenna, much less their HF one. One of the more popular solutions to not drilling a hole, is the Diamond K400. Here's something to consider. The mount in its various configurations, comes equipped with a 2 meter (about 6.5 feet) long piece of what appears to be RG174. That short length adds nearly 2 dB of loss on 2 meters, and 6 dB of loss on 70 centimeters (440)! So much for all that advertised gain by the import antenna manufacturers!
If that wasn't enough, every time you open or close the door or trunk the mount is attached to, the grip loosens with predictable results. And that isn't all! Click on the right photo to enlarge it. The damage you see is all too often the result of using a lip mount. I can assure you, this sort of damage is much more costly to repair, than a simple, 3/4 inch hole.
By far the most longest-lasting V/U mount out there is the NMO (new Motorola, shown above right) series. With few exceptions every manufacturer has at least one model incorporating it. Virtually every police department in the country uses this mount, and for good reason. Yes, it does require that a 3/4" hole be drilled. But if you take your time to do it correctly, it will never leak even when the antenna has been removed. When trade in time comes no one will care. Just tell them it is for a cell phone.
The special NMO type mount shown right, is another knock-off originally designed to circumvent the Motorola patent. While apparently waterproof, using such a mount locks you into one brand of antenna; not always a good idea, especially if you're into off-road activities.
The NMO mount shown at left is from Breedlove. One can't argue about its sturdiness, even when mounted in thin sheet metal. It is interesting in that the coax attaches via spade lugs, making remounting easier. However, at UHF there will be a slight impedance bump, but one that shouldn't be significant under 500 MHz. Just keep the lead length as short as you can.
SO239 mounts (shown left), the 5/16 inch Antenna Specialists stud mount, and their snap-in 3/8 inch mount should be avoided if for no other reason than they are not waterproof, not to mention their lack of sturdiness. Since the coax typically comes straight out of the mount instead of at a right angle like the one shown, they are not suitable for over headliner use (roof mounting). By the way, note the weather cap in the left photo.
If you don't have the proper tools to install an NMO, or any mount for that manner, be it in the roof or the trunk, I have a good suggestion; go to your local two-way radio dealer. For a nominal fee they'll install the mount in about 20 minutes, and if you want them too, they can also install the power wiring. One local shop here in Roswell, will do both for about $50 depending on the vehicle.
The Antenex® (Laird Technologies) NMO hole saw shown at right, retails for $60. However, they're available through several online retailers for as little as $35. It pays to shop around.
Roof mounting of V/U antennas is always best, but on vehicles with sun roofs and/or side curtain SRS devices, it can be a problem. Trunk mounting is second best, but if your vehicle doesn't have a trunk, the front fenders or cowl area are alternatives.
As a side light, Walt Bordett, N2IK, suggested using the Antenex saw for drilling holes through the firewall for running power cables. This is an excellent suggestion, and one I had never thought of. Thanks for the tip Walt.
If you have a Dodge Ram PU, it is difficult to mount antennas in the roof due to the double, corrugated construction. Here is a hood mount that will work on the Ram. Please note; 2006 and later Dodge Rams and Dakotas require a different bracket than earlier models.
If your antenna uses a standard 3/8x24 thread, and you have a flat mounting surface (roof or trunk lid), the Breedlove puck mount shown at left may be the answer. It obviously requires drilling holes, and about 1 inch of under-panel clearance. Properly mounted, it can easily hold a Hustler® 2 meter colinear antenna.
Those 3/4 inch electrical conduit punches available from your local hardware store should not be used to punch a hole for an NMO mount! While a 3/4 inch chassis punch works well, a conduit punch will leave a hole 1/8 inch too large.
Just about every kind of transceiver mount you can imagine, is made commercially. The Mounts article contains links, and descriptions to many of them. Decent quality mounts are not inexpensive, and for good reason. They have to be sturdily made, and designed to correctly fit the many different transceivers on the market.
Some might ask why they need a different mount, when their radio already came with one. Simply looking at the supplied mount will give you the answer. They're made to attach to the head and/or body of the transceiver, but no provisions are made to attach it inside the vehicle. Remembering that the radio's controls needs to be easily reached, yet out of the way of SRS devices, and vehicle controls, it is easy to see why so many amateurs opt for a custom mount. It pays to be safe than sorry.
Most V/U antennas come with RG58, solid dielectric coax. At V/U frequencies long lengths of it are indeed lossy. At the lengths we deal with in mobile applications, the loss isn't significant. The few tenths of a dB savings RG8 would give over smaller coax, will not suddenly make your signal heard an extra 50 miles. However, coax cable smaller than RG58 (RG174 is an example), should be avoided, especially at UHF. It is interesting to note (as alluded to above), that several Pacific rim manufacturers hype their gain figures, and then ship their antennas with mounts equipped with RG174.
Some antenna manufacturers' installation kits contain RG58/U, which has a solid conductor center. If yours was, replace it a stranded version or you'll end up with an open circuit, sooner than later.
Foam insulated coax, RG8X for example, requires special care. Remembering that the interior of a closed vehicle can exceed 160°F when parked in summer heat, the bend radius shouldn't be less than 3 inches to minimize migration of the center conductor under these extreme conditions.
Lastly, take time to install your connectors properly. An open antenna circuit is just as bad as a shorted one, and improper connector installation can cause both scenarios.
Setting the Standing Wave Ratio is an important installation procedure, but not one to fret over afterwards. Unlike the HF bands, most VHF antennas will cover the whole band segment without the need to retune. That is to say, the SWR of an NMO2/70 will be low across the FM portion of the respective bands. Thus the need for an in-line SWR bridge is superfluous. If you're going to operate on the SSB portion, you shouldn't be using a vertical antenna anyway.
Let me make an important point here. If your mobile vertical antenna will cover all 4 MHz of the 2 meter band (or 70 cm) with a low SWR, you need a better antenna and/or installation! This statement is pointed directly at the cheaply made import antennas. The reason for their bandwidth is simply because their overall losses are high.
A common mistake made by newcomers is to install a permanent wattmeter on an FM transceiver. Using one to set the SWR is one thing, but by the time a wattmeter tells you anything of value about your transceiver, you will have no doubt discovered the problem. What's more, it is just one more thing to go wrong.
I wouldn't recommending a brand or model of V/U transceiver on a bet, as there are just too many different ones to choose from, like Icom's IC-2720 at left, and their V8000 on the right. While I won't recommend one, I will make a suggestion or two up front.
First, never buy a handheld as a first (or only) radio. Most are FM only, and even if they have AM or SSB capabilities, they are severely limited in these modes. All the extra features like weather alert, aircraft frequency coverage, and extended receive are superfluous to the majority of the users.
Secondly, don't limit yourself to an FM only as your first radio, like Yaesu's FT-1802 at left. An FM only capability also limits your scope of amateur radio, and squelches your desire toward upgrading (pun intended).
Further, don't let anyone talk you into a specific transceiver. Remember, it is just like choosing a vehicle. You need to choose the one that meets your needs, not theirs! If at all possible, go to your nearest dealer and play with the various models, like the Yaesu FTM-10Rb (right photo). By the way, the FTM-10R was (it is no longer sold) the first mobile transceiver with Bluetooth® capabilities, but it isn't the only one. While Yaesu seems to be leading the charge for Bluetooth®, until the turn around timing (transmit to receive, and visa versa) problem gets fixed, it will not be widely accepted.
Dual band units seemingly have replaced most mono band ones. Some are remotable, some not, and the power output runs from 10 watts to well over 75 watts. Most are FM only, but a lot of them are multi-mode (SSB, AM, etc.). To be honest, there isn't much difference in specs between any of them except in the eyes of the beholder. It is the ease of operation which is most important, especially when they are operated mobile. Keep this in mind when making your choice.
Virtually every V/U transceiver out there has sub-audible or digital squelch built in, and most have both. If you have a choice, buy both. There is a large number of repeaters using sub-audible encoding, and the number using digital encoding is growing. If you don't need it now, you soon will. This goes for Icom's D-Star as well. If you can afford it, buy it, as digital communications are the wave of the future. That's an Icom ID-1 in the photo.
If the new-wave of miniaturized radios have a drawback, it is their menuing system. It is tough enough programming them when you're sitting still, much less underway. What's more, most owners manuals are written by engineers, and then poorly translated. This shortcoming can be addressed by going to Nifty Accessories. Their Radio Cards and Mini-Manuals are concise, and easy to read. Prices range from $5 to about $25 which is very reasonable considering their worth.
Remotable transceivers have become all of the rage these days, and for good reason. The number of safe and convenient mounting places in today's vehicles are scarce at best. Remote control allows the main part of the transceiver to be placed under a seat, or in the trunk. Where ever you place it, make sure it has adequate ventilation. Remember, a 75 watt out radio has to dissipate about 85 watts of heat during transmit. Avoid hanging it under the package shelf as this is one of the hottest places in a vehicle. One attribute to keep in mind while your researching your purchase is where does the microphone attaches. If it is on the main unit (like some Kenwood models) rather than on the head, you might want to rethink your purchase. Long microphone cable runs can cause problems.
Stick with the factory microphone! Most all of them are semi noise canceling, and the internal deviation and audio adjustments are tailored for them. Replacing it with a power mic is asking for trouble. And please, if you just can't help yourself and replace it anyway, don't use one with a roger-beep. On the amateur bands, this is a sure sign of a lid and will only bring negative criticism.
Some factory-supplied microphones are capable of more than just sending TouchTones®. Add up and down buttons, function and band buttons, a myriad of other features, and things get dicey. If you have trouble figuring it out in the store before you buy it, think about the trouble you'll have while you're underway? In this case, simple is better.
One attribute missing (thankfully) in most V/U mobile transceivers is VOX (voice operated transmit). If your transceiver has it, please don't use it mobile. Just about the time you get used to it, some road-raged knuckle head driver will elicit a vile comment, and all of your friendly repeater users will know exactly what you're thinking.
Sooner or later, everyone owns a handheld. They're often called walkie-talkies, and by a few less affable names. They range in price from as low as $59, to as high as $700. Most are FM only, but a few cover AM and SSB, at least in receive mode. There are even some capable of receiving video. Band coverage from one band to multiple bands, and extends from 29 MHz to 1,296 MHz. Output power ranging from 1 to as much as 7 watts.
The most unfortunate issue with handhelds, is far too many amateurs select one as an only transceiver. Since most are limited to FM, and typically 2 meters and 70 cm, it isn't difficult to understand the limitations they impose on a new amateur operator. Adding insult to this scenario, is the fact that mobile mounting brackets are nonexistent. And, almost all of them require a special power adapter to power them from an accessory socket, an already limiting power source.
To safely operate a handheld mobile, an external microphone is a basic requirement, as is some sort of external amplification for the audio output. While a headset may be used, some jurisdictions don't allow their use. So for mobile use, they leave a lot to be desired.
If you just have to have one, do your homework. Most of the late-model units from China are limited in their scope, and difficult to program. The best advice is to go to your local dealer, and play with the offerings, and pick the one that best suits your needs.
A Note on APRS
Automatic Position Reporting Systems are all the rage, and there are several web sites devoted to it, including this one. The basic requirements are GPS (Global Positioning System) receiver, although some are built in, and (typically) a dedicated transmitter to uplink the data periodically. Ground stations all over the country (planet) receive the data, and relay it to the various web sites via the internet. The Kenwood TM-D710A is a popular radio for such activity. By the way, Icom bias aside, the D710A is about the best dual bander for the money. If you have the earlier model (D700A), and want the capabilities of the D710A, then talk to your dealer first! Why? You don't have to buy an all-new radio, just the head, and you save a bundle.
The big three all have at least one model with an GPS receiver built in, and Yaesu even has a hand held with a GPS option. Whether you use a stand-alone GPS or one built in, APRS has never been easier. Fact is, there are so many variations of the theme, it would take a dedicated web site just to cover the basics. If you really want someone to know where you are at all times, the APRS is for you. I suggest you do a Google search, but be prepared, you'll get nearly 4 million hits!
Yaesu's new dual band (includes 220 MHz, USA only) FTM-350AR shown at right has some unique features if you're into APRS. It sports an NMEA standard GPS port for compatible GPS units, or you can opt for the new FGPS-2, a fully-functioning GPS system complete with an antenna. It is one of the few fully stand-alone, amateur APRS transceivers. At 50 watts (1 watt on 220 MHz), it powerful enough to reach a node in all but the most remote locations. It is also remotable.
FM transceivers present an unique power requirement. For example, a 75 watt output unit like the Icom V8000 draws 15 amps on transmit which is about 6 or 7 amps more than the average current a 100 watt SSB transceiver draws. Obviously wiring size is important, yet the V8000 power cord as supplied by Icom is slightly smaller than size 10 awg. This presents several potential problems which we'll explore shortly.
While I am on the subject of power keep one important aspect in mind. All major manufacturers rate their power output when the transceiver is supplied with a nominal 13.8 VDC. In the real world, mobile power can be anything from 11 VDC to about 14.2 VDC. If you measure the power out of the aforementioned V8000 when the supplied voltage is about 12 VDC, the power out will only be about 50 watts, perhaps less! This points out the need for adequate wiring, and in all honesty, the factory cable may be inadequate for all but the shortest runs. I cover this subject in my Wiring article along with several other important considerations including proper fusing.
If you're a long winded type, I wouldn't run the V8000 in high power. Fan or no fan, this radio gets HOT! I've never measured the heatsink temperature, but after a 2 minute transmission the heatsink gets hot enough that you don't want to touch it. Obviously, they need lots of ventilation no matter the duty cycle. One more comment; 75 watts out (most hover around 70 watts due in part to a low supply voltage) will over heat most import antennas. Poor mounting techniques exacerbate the problem.
One power-related drawback common to almost every VHF transceiver, is there's no auto-off feature. This drives some folks to use existing (switched) vehicle wiring, and that is always a bad idea. Or, they resort to using relays, which is also a bad idea. There is a solution.
The PowerWerx APO3 is more than just a timed (0, 5, 10, 20 minutes), auto off device. There are four pre-programmed voltages (11.8, 12.1, 12.7, 13.05 volts) settings. Properly programmed, the APO3 will turn off, and on, your radio just by monitoring the battery voltage!
It can handle up to 30 amps making it compatible with almost any radio. It comes equipped with Anderson Powerpole connectors, making wiring simple, and quick! At $60 (MSRP) it is also affordable. Visit their web site for more information.
West Mountain Radio makes a similar device, called the PWRguard® shown at right. It contains a 40 amp FET, controlled by circuitry which shuts off if the input voltage drops below 11.5 VDC, or goes over 15 VDC. Its application in a portable application is obvious, but can be useful in a mobile installation as well.
It should be noted that most mobile transceivers use electronic on/off switching. If you remove the power when the transceiver is on, and then reapply the power, they will not come back on without pushing the power button.
There are several important things to remember about running high power V/U operation. One of these is safety! As we go higher in frequency and power, the distance you should be away from the antenna goes up. When I was using a 160+ watt power amplifier on two meters through a 5/8 wave roof mounted antenna, you could feel the heat on the side of your face from 5 feet away. While no scientific study has confirmed the dangers, if you can feel the heat it can't be doing you any good! Doubly so if you or one of your friends has a heart pacemaker or similar device. After all, this is how microwave ovens work; they heat food with RF radiation.
If you intend to use one of these on FM, you'll need to add a fan to keep the heatsink cool. Even then, you should keep transmissions short. Remember, at VHF, 160 watts out, requires about 350 watts input, and the differential goes up in heat! Incidentally, running high power FM in an urban setting is overkill, and may make you a few enemies in high density areas where the distances to the next repeater on the same frequency pair are short. Save it for simplex and rural areas.
If your main use is SSB, it is best to use relay control rather than the built in RF switching. RF switching the units will eventually cause the preamp to fail, and most likely the transfer relay as well. Anyone who has used one of these amps, knows these are the two most common failure modes.
Mirage amps are very popular due in part to their lost cost versus power out. You see a number of these on the used market as a result. Personally, I'd steer clear of the early models as some of the final transistors used in them are no longer available and/or expensive. So, don't buy a used one from anyone without actually seeing it work through a wattmeter into a dummy load.
Later production models are wired for compatibility with their RC-1 remote control. MFJ publishes instructions on how to modify early models to use the RC-1. If you purchase one of these field-modified units, and you do not have the RC-1, the amp will not work even though the on light is lit. It is easy to rewire the amp to original specs, or to build your own RC-1. Schematics are not included in on line documents, but you can e-mail Mirage and request one.
Mirage amps, and most other brands, have much lower driver requirements than base amps. An Icom IC-706 will easily over drive any current commercial V/U mobile amp. What's more, most mobile transceivers exhibit a power over shoot on key down. This short duration spike can be as much as 150 watts, even if the transceiver is set for a low SSB output level. Thus, a relay control line is a must as outlined above.
The Mirage B-XX50 series has been discontinued. This is probably a godsend for the uninitiated! The B-5030 puts out 300+ watts with 50 watts of drive. Even a Larsen NMO2/70 will eventually melt under this amount of RF. Using one mobile is a mixed bag of tricks too, as the current draw is nearly 50 amps, plus that required to power the transceiver.
If you do repair work on any of these VHF amps, make sure you secure the cover in place before you attempt to use it! The lid acts as an RF shield, and must be secure screwed down. This caveat cannot be over emphasized! Remember, at VHF frequencies, even a small opening in a seam can act as a slot radiator which can cause irreparable eye damage! If you're the least bit queasy, leave repairs to a professional!
Mobile single sideband V/U operation has a small but dedicated following, due in part the Icom IC-7000 (left), and other relatively low cost all-mode transceivers. Even without elaborate beam antenna setups, it is possible to talk over distances unheard of with simplex FM, especially when there is a band opening. Here is a site which predicts VHF openings based on ARPS data, and can be a great tool if you're into VHF DXing.
It is not uncommon to work over distances of 100 miles with just 50 watts, and a vertical. Add the aforementioned 160 watt amplifier by Mirage, a horizontal loop antenna, and 200 miles isn't uncommon in open country. Stack a pair of halos, and you have a formidable roamer! If you're interested in roamer operation, I suggest you look into one of the publications the ARRL has on this type of VHF operation.
The right photo is my Honda Ridgeline. The HF antenna is a Scorpion 680, the 6 meter halo is an M-Squared, and the V/U antennas are Larsen NMO2/70BKs (one not shown attached to an Icom IC-208H). The combination gives me all-mode operation from 80 meters through 70 cm.
Odds and Ends
Some vehicle computer systems use a color burst crystal as an oscillator (3.579545 MHz). The 41st harmonic is 146.76134 MHz, which causes problems with the 146.16/76 repeater pair. However, component tolerances can cause the harmonic to be anyplace between about 146.70 MHz, to as high as 146.80 MHz. If you live in an area that uses this repeater pair, be advised that automobile manufacturers will not address the issue. See the Digital Electronics article for more data.
If you're into operating SSB in the VHF bands, you might want to visit the K. C. VHF Grid Bandits web site. It just proves, for whatever reason, when you're into SSB VHF, you're really into it!
There are still a few autopatches dotted throughout the country, but with the popularity of cell phones, their days are numbered. Nonetheless, most V/U transceivers have touch tone microphones as standard equipment. Nowadays, they are most often used to access mega linked repeaters. It is also a prerequisite for using VoIP in its various forms.
Speaking of repeaters. The Repeater Builders web site offers a lot of information of interest to any VHF operator. Mike Morris, WA6ILQ, and the group have assembled quite a data base covering both GE and Motorola repeaters, and all of the accessories which go with them. If you're into VHF operation, it is a great resource.
If you own an Icom IC-7000, be aware the supplied HM151 mic will not do live TouchTones®. Instead, you have to preprogram the codes into memory, and there are only four. If you need live TouchTones®, you could opt for the standard touch tone mic. Or, if you're adept at building minor accessories, you might look here Pipo Pads. They have models to suit just about any need.
Most of the repeater and linking equipment are owned by individuals with amateur radio clubs a close second. All of this equipment, and the time and expense needed to keep them running is not an inexpensive proposition. If you use any facility on a regular basis, you need to help support it. When I was traveling extensively I paid dues to five different clubs so I could use their repeaters.
There are times you shouldn't use any of your mobile facilities. If the distraction is too great with respect to traffic, passengers, or the weather, hang up the microphone and pay attention to your driving.
I have never had a problem with my wife telling me no to that next installation. Those amateurs who use their wives as an excuse for not properly installing mobile radio equipment shouldn't be considering mobile operation in the first place. I have said many times before, the phrase throwing the rig in the car and taking a trip has no merit. Take the time to do it right and you'll never have a problem. Do it hurriedly, make a mess of it, and I'll guarantee your wife will unglue. Think about it.